The priest, the warrior, and the peasant; (August 22, 2009)
Another alternative title could be more realistic and comprehensive such as “Elder, male, and female” but it is not catchy enough. George Dumezil is a French researcher who can speak over 20 languages; he says “The first ten languages are the hardest to learn; then the remaining languages come pretty easy because it is the same routine and same thing”. George Dumezil wrote the trilogy “Myth and Epic” that describes the mythologies in Ireland, Iceland, Scandinavia, Germany, Roman, Greek, Ossetia (Caucasus region), and then links all these mythologies to their hierarchical transmission from the Indian Mahabharata and Bhagavat mythology. He calls this unifying mythology “The Indo-European mythology” and end up with a summary that this mythology is based on three fundamentals the Priesthood, Warrior, and Peasant classes with their respective Gods.
After over 40 years of detailed research to reach this common sense conclusion is a monstrous let down. Da! This classification of society is common to all cultures and civilizations and going pretty strong nowadays. (Over the three main Gods Justice, War, and Fecundity, there was always an all encompassing unifying God that was barely worshiped by the people because not symbolizing their trade or class). The Romans had the (Jupiter, Mars, and Quirinus); the Scandinavian counties had Odinn reigning over the Val-Holl of (Porr, Mimir, and Odrerir); Ases was their unifying God; the Germans had Wotan reigning over their Walhalla. In the Near East mythology we had (Shamsh, Baal, and Ashtarout); El or Allah in the Arab Peninsula was their unifying God. In the Nile civilization we had Amon (Sun), Osiris, and Isis.
The major let down is this conventional direction of researchers of thinking top down or hierarchically. Well, after the Scandinavian got their mythology from Ossetia that got their mythology from Northern India then from whom did the Indian receive their mythology? If there are any written records that go many thousands of years in antiquity (not probable) we might discover that mythology transmission is no longer hierarchical but cyclical. Adopting the easy hierarchical line of reasoning is basically wrong; it is the wrong logic to consider; simply because it is conventional which consider that the King/Priesthood classes are the transmitters of culture and civilization. The Priesthood class is mainly the conservative maintainer of the status quo and barely the transmitter of much anything.
A more realistic and promising line of reasoning is to consider that it is the warrior classes that transmitted rituals, myths, and customs. It is the soldiers and sub officers who were in direct and daily contact with the conquered people; they are the ones who interrogated prisoners, facilitated trade and communication, and learned by osmosis the new culture and civilization of the subjugated people. The soldiers and sub officers returned to their hometowns and villages and disseminated their story telling testimonies and accounts of their war period.
The dissemination was quick because most soldiers were mercenaries from the neighboring countries to the powerful Kingdom. Once the war was over the soldiers were disbanded to return mainly to their families and spread the news of alternative rituals, myths, customs, and techniques of the conquered culture.
Since communication of central government of Empires with neighboring countries was not constant then the peasant classes managed to change their traditions for some time before the government realized the changes. When central government is strong then either of two possibilities was activated. If the mercenary warriors sided with the peasants then the King/Priesthood was defeated and the newer traditions and mythologies took roots. If the King/Priesthood vanquished then many varieties of sects and cults mushroomed in the neighboring kingdom.
Empires come and go but the tank sources for mercenaries were constant. These warriors came from mountain chain regions and high plateaus or desert regions. In “Indo-European civilization” the mercenaries flocked from the Turkish Anatoly Plateau and its extension in the Caucasus of Georgia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Ossetia, Chechnya, Albania, and Romania. The people were known as Cherkessk, Kurd, Tatar, Parthian, Scythe, and so on. The other sources of mercenaries came from Central Asia such as Turkmenistan, Kirghisia, Tajikistan, and Mongolia.
The main central EMPIRE was Persia that extended many times from coastal Turkey to all of Afghanistan and part of Pakistan. Babylon and later Assyria empires were counties of current Iran that moved the Capitals to their provinces as central power weakened in Persia. The same is true for the Hittite Empire in Anatolia that expanded to Egypt and signed the first recorded peace treaty with Egypt after the battle of Caddish. The Hittite aided the Greek by all means to defeat the Empire of Troy: Troy was a major handicap to extending to the coast and building a navy.
The urban centers in plains rich with major water resources and large rivers hires mercenaries to defend or expand empires. The Near East region was City-States centers for Priesthood/learning class and peasant/skilled artisans class (the bread basket) that hired mercenaries for the war effort to defend the cities. Empires that could not maintain autochthones soldiers as majority of their armies vanished in no times.
When studying civilizations and their continuity we should never dismiss the main factor: climate. There are the cold, mild, and hot weather civilizations. Within these three categories there are the plain and mountain region people. Talking about “indo-European” languages or civilizations is stretching the imagination a tad too far and forcing issues.
It is not with the antiques written records of the elite class that civilizations and dissemination of culture can be described and comprehended but with archeological finds of daily living, rituals, and customs within homogeneous climatic regions.
Note 1: I had the topic from “Smell of Time” (Odeur du temps) by Jean d’Ormesson who published three articles on George Dumezil. I didn’t read “Myth and Epic” and hope that d’Ormesson did.
Notes 2: The nomadic desert Jewish tribes could not invent but one God “Yahwa”; Jehovah ended up to be their warrior God. When the Jews of Moses got in contact with the Canaanites in Palestine, Yahwa was set aside during peaceful period to be resurrected during war period and his statues and temples approached to God Baal in order for the Jews to be hired as mercenaries.
No comments:
Post a Comment