“Peace treaty”: Paris, 1919; (Nov. 14, 2009)
I watched a documentary on the French channel TV5 this Thursday, Nov. 12, 2009. The documentary was relating and commenting on the five months that dragged on before the most lousy “peace treaty” was finally signed to end WWI. The chiefs of the main 5 nations who won in the First World War sat around in Paris to discuss how to partition the world. The government chiefs were: USA (Wilson), Britain (Lloyd George), France (Clemenceau), Italy, and Japan. Germany had ceased fire; the Kaiser, “Emperor Guillaume”, is settled in the Netherlands. Turkey is declared defeated as ally to Germany.
Every delegation from all over the world, when allowed, was given 10 minutes to expose his case and demands. Ho Chi Minh (from Viet Nam) was refused an appointment; he will later defeat the French in 1954 and then the US forces in 1973. Wilson wanted to discuss establishing a world organization of State of Nations to prevent further military escalations; the other four leaders were trying hard to convince Wilson that they are not against this idea but there are more urgent matters to resolve at this junction. The four other leaders wanted to redraw world’s borders; cartographers spent 5 months redrawing borders. Wilson wanted the people to decide and vote for their destiny; the other four leaders tried hard to educating Wilson on pragmatic procedures.
In the meantime, Communism was spreading everywhere in Europe and the USA; the “Spanish flu” had decimated 20 millions in Europe and America (it was called the “Spanish flu” simply because it was the Spanish press that divulged this scourge that States were trying to keep under cover. Soldiers were returning from the war front at the pace of 100,000 each month; I see one-legged soldiers hoping around in a baseball game and their companions laughing and having good time. Soldiers were returning home to experience famine, miseries, and desolate institutions to taking care of business.
The world’s “five leaders” are smoking cigars and pipes and looking mightily serious. Lloyd George wanted 300 billions in gold for war reparation from Germany; his financial counselor, the famous Keynes, is steadfastly suggesting agreeing on 10 billions for material damages on the ground that Germany could barely pay even that amount; Lloyd George had plenty of time to get practical at this stage. Wilson does not want any reparations and the other four leaders are fuming because it was not the US that lost millions of dead and injured soldiers and civilians in the war. Clemenceau wants to recover the Alsace and Loraine in addition to La Sarre region, rich in goal production, in Germany to exploit for 15 years in war reparation. The Italian President just wants a port on the Adriatic Sea as an advanced post to check any resurgence of hostility but he is adamantly refused his wish.
A Germany delegation of over 110 individuals arrives in Paris to deal a peace treaty. The train is made to stop first in Verdun where 450 thousand soldiers on both sides died. This delegation is typing reams of legal papers claiming that they are not the only culprit for starting the war. The vanquishers have no time to read the German side of view: they want Germany to admit that it is the sole bad party and that it had lost the war. The Germans are upset: why discuss a peace treaty if the other party has already made his mind? The German delegation refused the humiliating peace deal and the war was on the verge of resuming. The German sank their merchant marine in order not to be captured by the allies. Clemenceau is furious because he could not convince Lloyd George to jointly board these ships to avoid sabotage.
By now, Wilson is totally worn out and more hawkish than even Clemenceau. In the last 5 days before the refusal of Germany to sign the humiliating peace treaty Lloyd George had second thoughts: if Germany is completely humiliated then any demy-god would take power and start another war. Lloyd George also needed to do trade goods with a strong Germany. What Keynes suggested as reasonable reparation of 10 billions in gold is fine with Lloyd; Germany does not need to admit that it lost the war. The problem was how to convince Wilson after manipulating him for five month on pragmatic politics. Wilson is adamant: Germany has to understand that it lost the war; period! Then the German Chancellor resigned and another peace delegation arrived in Paris and signed the treaty in Versailles. Wilson could go home to face major downturns.
The Italian President lost the election and could not attend the peace signing ceremony: Mussolini was on the rise. The American Congress refused the plan of Wilson for establishing the Society of Nations. China and Japan were not satisfied; Japan will invade China in 1935 and capture Korea as a colony.
While the leaders in Paris were discussing dividing the world into mandated colonies Wilson’s concept of people deciding on their future destiny by vote went down the drain as the months eroded his determination into “pragmatic” attitudes. Clemenceau got just what he asked La Sarre. Poland recaptured a region in Germany with the Dantzig port.
The Middle East people want independence from Turkey that lost the war. No problems. Hussein of Mecca has many children. One of them by the named of Faissal is appointed King to Syria and Lebanon. Another by the name of Abdullah is appointed King to Jordan. A third is appointed King to Iraq, I think: I am confused. Wilson sent a delegation to gather field intelligence on the wishes of the people. Clemenceau and Lloyd George had another plan: they partition the Middle East between them. France is to have mandate on Syria, Lebanon, and “Antaquia” in Turkey that Syria claimed to be part of its lands. England is to have mandate on Iraq, Jordan, and Palestine. There were barely 5,000 immigrant Jews in Palestine at the time.
Clemenceau sent a French army to depose King Faissal and govern his “mandated people”. Mount Lebanon is split from Syria and more lands are attached to Lebanon so that it might have the illusion of agricultural “self-sufficiency”.
No comments:
Post a Comment